By ahnationtalk on February 18, 2025
By ahnationtalk on February 18, 2025
By ahnationtalk on February 18, 2025
By ahnationtalk on February 18, 2025
By ahnationtalk on February 18, 2025
You can use your smart phone to browse stories in the comfort of your hand. Simply browse this site on your smart phone.
Using an RSS Reader you can access most recent stories and other feeds posted on this network.
SNetwork Recent Stories
![]() | ![]() |
by ahnationtalk on May 19, 2020486 Views
On April 23, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed, with costs, an application for leave to appeal the PEI Court of Appeal’s decision in Mi’kmaq of P.E.I. v. Province of P.E.I. et. al. (Mill River)1. Mill River, released in November 2019, offered a fresh and helpful perspective on the Crown’s duty to consult.
The authors were counsel of record for the Province of Prince Edward Island (Province).
The original judicial review was brought by the Mi’kmaq of PEI (Mi’kmaq) when the Province sold the Mill River golf course, following a consultation process that started in 2012. The Mi’kmaq, who claim Aboriginal title to all of Prince Edward Island, argued that the Crown had not satisfied its duty to consult.
The Court of Appeal concluded that the Crown’s duty to consult never arose in the circumstances of the sale, and that the Province’s consultation efforts, in any event, were sufficient to discharge any duty to consult that arose.
Clients: | No Clients |
---|
Categories: | Law, Mainstream Aboriginal Related News |
---|
This article comes from NationTalk:
https://nationtalk.ca
The permalink for this story is:
https://nationtalk.ca/story/canada-duty-to-consult-requires-a-potentially-material-adverse-effect-mondaq-news-alerts
Comments are closed.