By pmnationtalk on September 21, 2025
By ahnationtalk on September 19, 2025
By ahnationtalk on September 19, 2025
By ahnationtalk on September 19, 2025
By ahnationtalk on September 19, 2025
You can use your smart phone to browse stories in the comfort of your hand. Simply browse this site on your smart phone.
Using an RSS Reader you can access most recent stories and other feeds posted on this network.
SNetwork Recent Stories
![]() | ![]() |
by ahnationtalk on September 17, 202557 Views
September 17, 2025
In a precedent-setting decision with sweeping implications for landowners across British Columbia, the BC Supreme Court’s ruling in Cowichan Tribes v. Canada (Attorney General), 2025 BCSC 1490, raises important legal and practical questions about the nature and security of fee simple title – a term referring to ownership of full, permanent property rights– when it overlaps with Aboriginal title.
For landowners, public and private, this case sends a clear message: Fee simple title is not immune from constitutional scrutiny, and the existence of Aboriginal title can, in some circumstances, render that title invalid.
The legal landscape before Cowichan
Under BC’s Land Title Act and the Torrens system (BCs land title system that leverages an up-to-date record of land registry to determine ownership), registered owners of land in BC are typically granted indefeasible title, a title presumed to be conclusive and unchallengeable, even in the face of prior unregistered interests. However, the Canadian courts have long recognized that Aboriginal title is not created by statute but instead arises from the historic occupation of land by Indigenous peoples and is protected under s. 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982.
Read More: https://www.mltaikins.com/insights/cowichan-decision-raises-questions-around-fee-simple-titles/
Clients: | No Clients |
---|
Categories: | Law, Mainstream Aboriginal Related News |
---|
This article comes from NationTalk:
https://nationtalk.ca
The permalink for this story is:
https://nationtalk.ca/story/cowichan-decision-raises-questions-around-fee-simple-titles-mlt-aikins
Comments are closed.